First, a quick recap of my thoughts on the first major class discussion. I had never before considered the difference between the terms "Avant garde" and "experimental," and after reading Michael Nyman's article "Experimental Music: Cage and Beyond," and a class discussion, my general conclusion is this: both avant garde and experimental music fall largely outside the norm of "classical" music. Where they differ is in intention -- avant garde music has a specifically intended outcome, whereas experimental music has some element of unpredictability of performance, where not every part of the outcome is known even to the composer. (One quick note I've realized from this: using these definition, the music I tend to program on concerts is often avant garde, but the music I tend to compose or put together with friends for fun is usually experimental.)
Additionally, the avant garde tradition generally references the music of the norm while breaking free from it, while in contrast, experimental music often makes no reference to any other music, and exists in its own weird little vacuum.
The first composer focuses of this class are Charles Ives and Carl Ruggles. Both are from New England, so as a New Englander myself, I feel a little regional pride over this.
Charles Ives was born in Connecticut in 1874, and died there in 1954. By the end of his lifetime, he had become known as the first uniquely American composer -- unique in that he did not simply build upon the Western European tradition, but blazed his own trail. This trail was often markedly American, as he tended to incorporate American folk tunes, patriotic songs, and more into much of his work.
Ives
Last year, I wrote a term paper for Mark Radice's Class "The Symphony" on the topic of movement 2 of Ives's Three Places in New England. I'll quote my own paper here briefly:
"According to Connecticut composer Charles Ives
(1874—1954), one day during his childhood, his father found him attempting to
play the rhythms of cornet band drummers, using only a piano. Instead of instructing him on how to
play either piano or drums properly, his father, a musician, said to him ‘It’s
all right to do that, if you know
what you’re doing.' (Henry and Sidney Cowell, Charles Ives and His Music) As Charles grew up, these words would
become a guiding mantra for his compositions. He was, above all, a unique composer who never deviated from
his convictions and unconventional musical tastes, and did so with a well developed
and intelligent approach."
Ives fits definitely into the realm of the avant garde. His works fall far outside the norm of the day, as his compositional era (1900-1920s) was a time when most classical music was tonal, even if obscurely so, and not nearly as rhythmically or contrapuntally complex as his. In addition, his music is specifically composed, with a largely known outcome, and did not hold much of an experimental nature. It was in many ways the result of his own experiments, but by the time he put pen to paper, he was no longer experimenting, and knew what outcome would occur.
54th Massachusetts Regiment Memorial
Movement three depicts a scene of quiet contemplation along the Housatonic River in Stockbridge, MA, while hymns sing out over the water from a church across the river. This scene is largely dichotomous, juxtaposing quiet pensiveness with faraway hymnsong.
The Housatonic River in Stockbridge, MA
As is evident through these three movements, Ives loves mixing together different ideas (often all familiar to the audience) in the same place for different unique resultant effects. This style, especially as it exists in movement two, can be seen in a much more compact form in Ives's song "The Things Our Fathers Loved." Listen closely, and you should hear bits of melodies from MANY different well-known songs. Each is in a different key, and it may be from the beginning, middle, or end of the melody, but as often as every 3 or 4 notes, the music flows into a new quotation.
This is a small, concentrated example of the collage technique Ives used pervasively in movement two, and often in movements one and three of Three Places.
Another important American composer of the time is Carl Ruggles (1876-1971).
Ruggles
Ruggles, along with Ives and three others, belonged to a group of composers known as the American Five. This name references The Five, a group of late 19th-century Russian composers. The American Five all wrote in the realm of the avant garde shortly after the turn of the 20th century.
Ruggles's music is idiomatic and fiercely his own, as he never studied the work of other composers, and wrote so methodically and carefully that his output was glacially slow. Once he found his compositional style that would stick around until the end of his life, he only composed around ten pieces total, spanning forty years from 1918 to 1958. His music is dissonantly contrapuntal, and uses a general, non-serial technique of avoiding pitch class repetition within 8 notes.
Ruggles's best-known work is Sun-Treader (1926-31), a 15-minute piece for orchestra. Upon listening to it, I noted that it seemed to ebb and flow, to push forward then subside, repeatedly. Wikipedia tells me that I was right on the money: "Another distinctive feature of Sun-Treader is the presence of "waves", both in dynamics and pitch. Pitches will start low, then rise up to a climax, then descend again. Within the ascent (and descent) there are small descents (and ascents) leading to a self-similar (fractal) overall structure." This ebb and flow occurs in dynamics, tempi, rhythmic density, dissonant complexity, pitch, and more.
These two composers of the American Five set the scene for our first class discussion of specific pieces. I look forward to seeing whether they set the scene in a larger way for what is to come in the course.
No comments:
Post a Comment